Are WWE Polls As Scripted As Their Matches?

wwe_logo_fan_redesign___power_by_bluebrotherx7

Visiting the WWE website, I saw one of their online polls, this one asking you to vote on who is Goldberg’s greatest revival, the choices were given of Brock Lesnar, Kevin Nash, Triple H, Chris Jericho, Bret Hart, Sting or Other.

It gave me the current percentages that people have been voting on and currently as of the fifteenth of November 2016 when I cast my vote, Bret Hart and Chris Jericho stood equal on six percent, Other was equal with Kevin Nash on twelve, Sting was on thirteen percent, Triple H sat at fifteen percent and Brock Lesnar stood with a commendable lead with thirty-seven percent.

Now I am officially calling it, we either have some fucking idiots in the world or the polls are getting rigged to hype up their Lesnar/Goldberg match at this month’s Survivor Series on the twentieth but either way I am calling bullshit.

How can you say Brock Lesnar is Goldberg’s greatest rivalry? they’ve had one match and that was over a fucking decade ago and that bloody cluster-fuck of a match was voted as one of the worst matches in WrestleMania history.

At least with my vote of Sting you could include their rivalry from the old WCW days or the same with Kevin Nash, hell, in fact he’s faced Triple H more times than he has Brock Lesnar so how you can vote this way is some complete B.S.

I like to think my fellow followers of the sport are not that fucking stupid and they actually thought about their vote before casting so what’s the WWE trying to pull by rigging the votes if not just to hype up an up-coming match, that sounds about right for company.

Let’s just hope we don’t get a cluster-fuck round two at Survivor Series

MajorMadMike

Been a fan of the WWE since 2000, watched a few from the early years online, wasn’t a fan of where the “Powers that be” were taking the company but it has gotten better with the brand split, I thought that it was a format that worked